オストロムがノーベル経済学賞を取った!

出身講座界隈でよく聞く名前だったので、なんとなく、祝福。

で、彼女の受賞理由の中で、われらが山岸俊男先生の研究が引用されてた!

An important feature of the experiments was the introduction of sanctioning possibilities. In one experimental treatment, subjects would be informed about the contributions of all the other subjects in the previous round and be allowed to selectively punish each of the opponents. A punishment would be costly to both the punished opponent and the punisher. Thus, a rational and selfish individual would not punish if the game were played for one period only.

With the notable exception of Yamagishi (1986), previous experimental work did not allow subjects to punish each other selectively. Since punishment appears to be crucial in the field, it is of considerable interest to see whether it matters in the laboratory and, if so, why. Ostrom, Walker and Gardner (1992) find that many subjects engage in directed punishment in the laboratory, but that such punishment works much better if subjects are allowed to communicate than when they are not (Yamagishi, 1986, had confined attention to the no-communication condition).

トラックバック(0)

トラックバックURL: http://www.shudo-psy.net/manage/mt-tb.cgi/359

コメントする

2010年4月

        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  

このブログ記事について

このページは、NAKANISHI, Daisukeが2009年10月13日 16:19に書いたブログ記事です。

ひとつ前のブログ記事は「「進化と人間行動2009」の感想 (6 Oct, 2009)」です。

次のブログ記事は「日本社会心理学会第50回大会」です。

最近のコンテンツはインデックスページで見られます。過去に書かれたものはアーカイブのページで見られます。

Powered by Movable Type 4.21-ja